Castari logo

Castari

Vercel for AI Agents – Deploy sandboxed agents with MCP tools & skills

Fall 2025active2025Website
Artificial IntelligenceDeveloper ToolsB2BInfrastructure
Sponsored
Documenso logo

Documenso

Open source e-signing

The open source DocuSign alternative. Beautiful, modern, and built for developers.

Learn more →
?

Your Company Here

Sponsor slot available

Want to be listed as a sponsor? Reach thousands of founders and developers.

Report from 12 days ago

What do they actually do

Castari provides a managed platform to deploy and run AI agents in sandboxed environments with guardrails and controlled access to external tools/skills (including MCP-based tools). Their YC listing positions them as “Vercel for AI Agents – Deploy sandboxed agents with MCP tools & skills,” and the public site says they help teams “deploy production ready AI agents with predictable guardrails” (YC company page, castari.com, Anthropic on MCP).

Publicly, access is via a contact email rather than a self-serve signup or docs, suggesting the product is in private/early access at this stage (castari.com).

Who are their target customer(s)

  • Early-stage product teams adding an agent feature to their app: They need to ship an agent to production without building custom infra and worry the agent might call the wrong APIs or leak user data.
  • Mid-size SaaS engineering/platform teams: They want a consistent, auditable runtime so multiple teams don’t create ad-hoc, fragile deployments and access patterns.
  • Internal automation teams at regulated companies (finance, legal, HR): They must enforce strict access controls, logging, and approvals to meet compliance and fear unsafe agent actions in sensitive systems.
  • Developers who build connectors and integrations: They want a predictable runtime to expose tools safely to agents and avoid re-implementing one-off integrations for each project.
  • Security/ops teams responsible for production reliability: They need kill-switches, rate limits, and observability because model-driven automations can behave unpredictably and are hard to monitor.

How would they acquire their first 10, 50, and 100 customers

  • First 10: Founder-led, hands-on pilots via YC/network: embed an engineer to deploy one agent with a couple tools, de-risk with bespoke guardrails/NDAs, and convert pilots into referenceable case studies and referrals.
  • First 50: Invite-only beta with repeatable 4–6 week paid pilots; targeted outreach (LinkedIn/GitHub/communities/YC alumni), plus starter templates (Slack/CRM/DB) and 2–3 connector partners that recommend Castari; standardize a pilot-to-paid checklist.
  • First 100: Light self-serve (signup, templates, docs) and a paid pilot SKU; hire an SDR and a CS engineer to run demos/onboarding; run focused webinars/workshops by vertical and amplify wins into case studies and event presence to close larger platform/regulated accounts.

What is the rough total addressable market

Top-down context:

Castari sits between AI developer tooling and enterprise automation. As a proxy, the AI development tool software market is projected in the low-to-mid tens of billions over the next few years, while RPA/automation remains large and is adding “agentic automation” offerings (Statista, UiPath agentic platform announcement).

Bottom-up calculation:

Using ~$13B as a conservative proxy for AI dev tools, a managed agent-runtime slice at 1–10% implies ~$130M (1%), ~$650M (5%), and ~$1.3B (10%) TAM scenarios for platforms like Castari (Statista).

Assumptions:

  • Managed agent runtimes capture roughly 1–10% of AI dev tools spend in the medium term.
  • Castari addresses the runtime/guardrails/observability slice, not model training or raw cloud compute.
  • Buyers split budgets across devtools and automation; in-house builds and cloud incumbents limit near-term penetration.

Who are some of their notable competitors