Clad Labs logo

Clad Labs

brainrot ide

Fall 2025active2025Website
Developer Tools
Sponsored
Documenso logo

Documenso

Open source e-signing

The open source DocuSign alternative. Beautiful, modern, and built for developers.

Learn more →
?

Your Company Here

Sponsor slot available

Want to be listed as a sponsor? Reach thousands of founders and developers.

Report from 27 days ago

What do they actually do

Clad Labs makes Chad, a macOS code editor that keeps developers inside the IDE while AI generates code. During model inference, Chad embeds short-form entertainment, micro‑games, and social feeds in a side panel; when generation ends, the session auto‑closes so users resume work without switching apps (site, launch blog).

The product is live for early users with a freemium model: Free, Pro ($15/month), and Pro Max ($40/month) tiers that increase AI usage limits and unlock features like background processing (pricing). The team is YC‑backed (F25) and small; YC lists two founders (YC).

Who are their target customer(s)

  • Solo/hobby macOS developers who use AI assistants: They get bored or lose flow while waiting on AI generations and often switch apps; they want low-friction distractions inside the editor instead of context switching.
  • Professional developers at small companies or indie startups: Repeated micro‑interruptions during AI code generation add up over a day; they want to reduce context switches and are open to paying for tools that help.
  • Engineering managers and team leads: They worry about lost hours from fragmented workflows and want measurable productivity improvements, plus features like cross‑IDE sync and automation as the product matures.
  • Developers prone to distraction who prefer micro‑entertainment during wait times: Traditional breaks pull them out of context and make it harder to re‑engage; they want lightweight, time‑boxed activities that don’t leave the IDE.
  • Power users and automation‑first developers: They have to babysit multi‑step AI tasks across tools; they want background agents, orchestration, and automated reviews, with state synced across IDEs.

How would they acquire their first 10, 50, and 100 customers

  • First 10: Founder‑led outreach to private‑beta users, YC network, and close developer friends, offering free Pro access and 1:1 onboarding in exchange for usage logs and candid feedback (blog, YC).
  • First 50: Targeted seeding in macOS/AI‑dev communities (Slack/Discord, subreddits, Indie Hackers), live demos/AMAs, and a limited‑time Pro discount, amplified via LinkedIn and dev newsletters (site, pricing).
  • First 100: Coordinate Product Hunt/Hacker News and YC social posts, run small cross‑promos with AI assistants (e.g., Claude Code), and launch a referral‑credit program plus targeted paid tests for macOS devs while tracking retention (blog, YC).

What is the rough total addressable market

Top-down context:

Global developers number ~27M (Evans Data, 2024) to ~47.2M (SlashData, 2025). Using a macOS share of ~30–40% and ~76% AI‑tool adoption narrows the pool to AI‑using macOS devs; applying Chad’s $180–$480/yr paid tiers yields a multi‑billion USD TAM if all eligible users paid (Evans Data, SlashData, Stack Overflow, pricing).

Bottom-up calculation:

Conservative: 27M devs × 30% macOS × 76% AI use ≈ 6.16M eligible; at $180–$480/yr → ~$1.1B–$3.0B/yr. Higher: 47.2M × 40% × 76% ≈ 14.35M; at $180–$480/yr → ~$2.6B–$6.9B/yr. Realistic early SOM under typical 2–6% freemium conversion is in the tens to low‑hundreds of millions annually depending on ARPU (Evans, SlashData, Stack Overflow, conversion benchmarks, Lenny’s).

Assumptions:

  • macOS share among active developers ~30–40% (based on developer ecosystem surveys; varies by sample) (JetBrains data).
  • ~76% of developers use or plan to use AI coding tools (Stack Overflow 2024) (link).
  • Freemium conversion for dev tools typically 2–6%; ARPU ranges from $180–$480/yr based on published pricing (pricing, benchmarks).

Who are some of their notable competitors

  • Cursor: An AI‑native code editor with deep model integration, chat/edit workflows, and team features; a popular alternative to traditional IDEs for AI‑assisted coding (site, features).
  • Windsurf: An agentic IDE focused on keeping developers in flow with AI‑driven planning and editing; offers desktop editor and plugins for major IDEs (site, editor).
  • Zed: A fast, multiplayer code editor with integrated “Zed AI,” agentic editing, and real‑time collaboration features (Zed AI, overview).
  • JetBrains IDEs + AI Assistant: JetBrains’ AI Assistant plugin adds code generation, explanations, reviews, and more across IntelliJ‑based IDEs, leveraging their large installed base (features, plugin).
  • VS Code + GitHub Copilot: VS Code integrated with GitHub Copilot provides inline completions, chat, and agent mode; widely adopted and sets the baseline for in‑editor AI experiences (VS Code docs, Copilot).