Dollyglot logo

Dollyglot

Character.AI with real time video avatars

Winter 2025active2025Website
Generative AIConsumerSocialConversational AI
Sponsored
Documenso logo

Documenso

Open source e-signing

The open source DocuSign alternative. Beautiful, modern, and built for developers.

Learn more →
?

Your Company Here

Sponsor slot available

Want to be listed as a sponsor? Reach thousands of founders and developers.

Report from 13 days ago

What do they actually do

Dollyglot makes a web app that turns a single photo, a short voice sample, and a brief persona description into a live, talking video avatar you can speak with in real time. They call these avatars “Dollies.” In their demos, a user uploads an image, provides or records a voice, writes a short personality prompt, and then holds a live conversation while the avatar listens, replies, and renders synchronized video YC launch video example Dolly page.

The product is in early access with a public waitlist rather than a broad consumer launch. The team is publishing demos and example characters but has not announced large‑scale user numbers or pricing; their YC profile and waitlist page emphasize early access and rollout YC profile waitlist.

Who are their target customer(s)

  • Individual creators and influencers: They need quick, eye‑catching characters for streams and short videos without paying for actors or animation. Quality, simplicity, and avoiding misuse of real‑person likenesses are top concerns YC launch video example Dolly.
  • Indie game makers and interactive storytellers: They want believable, voiced characters in prototypes and small releases but lack the engineering budget for real‑time speaking faces; they also need behavior control and export options YC launch video.
  • Brands and marketers running campaigns: They want reusable spokescharacters without recurring talent costs, but face legal/reputation risk if an avatar impersonates someone or goes off‑brand; consent, moderation, and traceability are required risk discussion.
  • Education and kid‑focused apps / parents: They need engaging companions that are safe, age‑appropriate, and multilingual; strict moderation and behavior controls are mandatory YC profile.
  • Researchers and care/companionship startups: They need realistic, tunable agents for empathy and boundaries but face high production costs and limited consent controls; they require reproducible, safe avatars before deployment YC launch video.

How would they acquire their first 10, 50, and 100 customers

  • First 10: Onboard founders’ networks (YC batchmates, angels, close testers) with free credits and hands‑on sessions to co‑create a few high‑visibility Dollies and harden moderation/consent flows.
  • First 50: Target creator and indie‑dev communities (TikTok/Twitter, Twitch, r/gamedev/itch.io, Discord), seed 10–20 high‑engagement users with co‑creation sessions and small paid pilots, plus simple OBS/export guides and referral credits.
  • First 100: Convert the waitlist with a timed early‑access pass and pilot tier for small brands, education pilots, and research groups, backed by light account management, safe‑persona templates, and public case studies.

What is the rough total addressable market

Top-down context:

Relevant spend includes influencer/creator marketing (~$30–33B near term) and the growing digital‑avatar/digital‑human category (tens of billions), with gaming (~$180–190B) and edtech as large adjacencies where only a slice is addressable Influencer Marketing Hub (Statista) Grand View—digital avatar Newzoo—games.

Bottom-up calculation:

Start with influencer/creator campaign spend (~$30–33B) and assume a modest slice adopts avatar content with a small share of budgets flowing to tools; add a conservative portion of the digital‑avatar market plus a small fraction of indie/AA game‑dev and edtech budgets, netting overlap to reach a practical TAM of ~$25–$60B over the next few years Influencer Marketing Hub Grand View—digital avatar.

Assumptions:

  • Only a minority of influencer campaigns use avatar content in the near term, and tools capture a small share of each campaign’s budget.
  • A limited portion of digital‑avatar spend is for real‑time, conversational use cases similar to Dollyglot.
  • Overlap across creator, avatar, gaming, and edtech segments is removed conservatively.

Who are some of their notable competitors

  • D-ID: Talking‑head video and “visual AI agents” from photos/video, including a real‑time streaming API for conversational avatars—direct overlap with photo+voice→live avatar use cases docs.
  • Synthesia: Scripted AI presenter videos and custom avatars for training/marketing; strong on polished production even if less focused on open‑ended live chat features.
  • Soul Machines: Enterprise‑oriented “digital humans” that listen and respond with lifelike animation for CX and assistants; notable for real‑time interactive agents at enterprise scale Studio.
  • Hour One: Virtual human presenters from text with APIs for training and marketing content; overlaps on low‑cost, reusable speaking avatars for brands/education features.
  • Character.AI: Personality‑driven conversational characters and companions (text/voice‑first); a competitor on the character/companion layer even without photoreal live video output.