HealthKey logo

HealthKey

AI-powered Patient Identification for Clinical Trials

Winter 2025active2025Website
Sponsored
Documenso logo

Documenso

Open source e-signing

The open source DocuSign alternative. Beautiful, modern, and built for developers.

Learn more →
?

Your Company Here

Sponsor slot available

Want to be listed as a sponsor? Reach thousands of founders and developers.

Report from 10 months ago

What do they actually do

HealthKey builds software that helps clinical trial teams identify likely eligible patients from their own health records. Study staff enter a trial’s inclusion/exclusion criteria, and the system searches structured data (diagnoses, labs, medications) and relevant clinical notes to produce a ranked list for human review.

Coordinators use a dashboard to triage candidates, see why a patient was flagged, and log outreach and screening outcomes. Deployments typically begin as site-level pilots that connect to an EHR or accept secure data exports, with the goal of reducing manual chart review time and surfacing better-qualified candidates.

Who are their target customer(s)

  • Clinical research coordinator (CRC): Spends many hours manually screening charts and notes, leading to slow recruitment and a backlog of outreach. Needs to cut screening time and reduce false leads to focus on real candidates.
  • Site principal investigator (PI): Enrollment targets are missed because eligible patients are found late or not at all. Needs higher-quality, reliably triaged candidate lists so limited staff time goes to credible prospects.
  • Hospital research operations director: Must allocate scarce coordinator and clinic time across many studies without clear pipeline visibility. Needs predictable, auditable ways to estimate and improve enrollment across sites.
  • Sponsor/biotech clinical operations manager: Trials are delayed by slow site activation, variable site performance, and high screen-failure rates. Needs faster, more consistent patient identification so enrollment stays on schedule and budgets are predictable.
  • Hospital IT/data-security officer: Burdened by integration, privacy, and compliance work when connecting EHRs to third-party tools. Needs minimal-effort integrations, limited data exposure, and clear audit trails for IRBs and regulators.

How would they acquire their first 10, 50, and 100 customers

  • First 10: Run hands-on pilots with 5–10 investigator sites and CRC champions, offering a short free trial, secure one-time data exports if connectors aren’t ready, and a signed BAA; measure time saved per screened patient and qualified leads, and capture testimonials to use in sales.
  • First 50: Leverage early case studies to sell paid pilots to regional hospital networks, community research sites, and small CROs; use a standardized onboarding playbook with prebuilt EHR connectors and a fixed-price pilot, assign a CSM, and publish validated outcomes to convert pilots into multi-study contracts.
  • First 100: Hire a small sales team and SDRs focused on sponsors, national CROs, and high-volume site groups; build channel partnerships with EHR integrators/clinical software vendors, provide procurement-ready contracts and security certifications, add a low-touch self-serve path for smaller sites, and use account managers to expand across studies at each account.

What is the rough total addressable market

Top-down context:

HealthKey sits in clinical trial enrollment and site-operations software, selling to research-active sites and to sponsors/CROs. Without verified public counts, TAM depends mainly on how many sites can be onboarded, trials per site where identification is used, and the share of sponsor budgets captured.

Bottom-up calculation:

Model TAM as Site segment = S × T × P_site plus Sponsor/CRO segment = Trials_total × P_trial, with add-ons for integrations/compliance. Illustrative scenarios from pilot to scale yield roughly ~$3–4M at pilot pricing, ~$30–40M at repeatable US scale, and ~$250M+ with broad adoption.

Assumptions:

  • Integration speed and low-friction security reviews materially increase the reachable number of sites (S).
  • Typical sites run multiple eligible trials annually (T ~2–4) where patient identification is valuable.
  • Price points (P_site, P_trial) depend on demonstrated ROI: faster enrollment and fewer coordinator hours per enrolled patient.

Who are some of their notable competitors

  • Deep 6 AI: Uses automated extraction from EHRs (including notes) to find cohorts and individual patients for trials; competes on AI-driven chart searching for site and sponsor teams (see: https://www.deep6.ai/).
  • Clinerion: Provides hospital- and site-centered patient-finding across real-world EHR and de-identified data; strong for multi-site feasibility and networked searches (see: https://www.clinerion.com/).
  • TriNetX: A large real-world data network for feasibility queries and population discovery; focuses on cross-site cohort estimates and RWD analytics more than coordinator-facing screening dashboards (see: https://www.trinetx.com/).
  • Antidote (Antidote Tech): Focuses on matching patients to trials via patient-facing tools and digital recruitment campaigns, rather than deep EHR-integrated, site-side screening (see: https://www.antidote.me/).
  • Trialbee: Offers digital recruitment and pre-screening workflows that route matched patients to sites; emphasizes online conversion and campaign management over EHR-centric matching (see: https://www.trialbee.com/).