Kestral logo

Kestral

We automate your entire product development lifecycle.

Spring 2025active2025Website
ProductivityTeam CollaborationAI
Sponsored
Documenso logo

Documenso

Open source e-signing

The open source DocuSign alternative. Beautiful, modern, and built for developers.

Learn more →
?

Your Company Here

Sponsor slot available

Want to be listed as a sponsor? Reach thousands of founders and developers.

Report from 16 days ago

What do they actually do

Kestral is a hosted app that ingests customer feedback (calls, transcripts, tickets) and turns it into actionable tasks and projects, then ranks that work by likely impact. Their demo shows a single customer call becoming a security report, a bug, and a product suggestion that are tracked separately, with automated follow-ups to the reporter where appropriate Kestral homepage.

Under the hood, Kestral runs specialized AI agents to parse and tag content, create tasks with context, group them into projects, and prioritize them. The team uses a multi‑agent orchestration approach and switches between foundation models (e.g., Anthropic, OpenAI, Gemini) depending on the step Mastra blog on Kestral Kestral homepage.

Go‑to‑market today is early: a public site with “Sign up” and “Book a demo,” a small free tier (e.g., 1 active agent, limited uploads), and paid beta/enterprise plans for more runs, integrations, and support Kestral homepage YC listing.

Who are their target customer(s)

  • Product managers at product-led SaaS companies: They’re flooded with feedback from calls, tickets, and suggestions and spend hours triaging. They struggle to prove which requests drive outcomes and to keep a clean, prioritized backlog.
  • Customer support / success leads: They need to escalate issues with full context and keep customers informed. They lose time stitching together details from disparate systems and often miss closing the loop with reporters.
  • Engineering managers: They get noisy, duplicate, or incomplete bug reports. Engineers waste time reproducing unclear issues instead of fixing well‑scoped, prioritized work.
  • Product operations / program managers: They coordinate across teams without a single trusted feed of ranked work, so prioritization requires many meetings and manual updates.
  • Heads of product or CTOs at mid‑to‑large companies: They face slow, episodic prioritization cycles and limited visibility into the impact of what gets built, making outcomes unpredictable.

How would they acquire their first 10, 50, and 100 customers

  • First 10: Founder-led outreach to PMs and warm YC/inbound leads, offering a hands‑on pilot that ingests real feedback and returns a prioritized backlog plus automated follow‑ups. Measure before/after (triage time, duplicate rate, closed-loop %) to convert pilots to paid.
  • First 50: Turn early pilots into short case studies and use targeted LinkedIn/email outreach to PMs and support leads, while enabling a low‑friction self‑serve path (free tier → demo → paid pilot). Standardize onboarding (connectors, templates) to reduce founder time and drive conversion via ROI signals.
  • First 100: Hire one AE and one CS lead, package an enterprise pilot, and form partnerships with adjacent tools/communities. Shift toward product‑led growth with better in‑app onboarding and automatic ROI dashboards while the sales hire closes higher‑value deals.

What is the rough total addressable market

Top-down context:

Core categories map to product management software (~$30.3B) and feedback/insights tools (~$16.7B), implying ~ $47B of relevant spend today Verified Market Research TBRC. Adding adjacent contact‑center software (~$52.2B) and project‑management further expands the ceiling into the high tens of billions Fortune Business Insights Grand View Research.

Bottom-up calculation:

As an initial wedge, assume 50,000 PM/support/engineering teams at product‑led companies could adopt an automated feedback‑to‑roadmap tool at $10k–$20k ACV, implying a bottom‑up TAM of ~$0.5–$1.0B for the early product fit. Expansion into larger enterprises and adjacent workflows would grow this materially.

Assumptions:

  • Count of eligible product‑led companies with dedicated PM/support/engineering teams is 50k+ globally.
  • Buyers will pay $10k–$20k ACV for automated triage, prioritization, and follow‑ups that integrate with existing tools.
  • Kestral complements or partially replaces current product/feedback tooling rather than owning entire contact‑center or project‑management budgets.

Who are some of their notable competitors

  • Productboard: Centralizes feedback from sources like Slack, Zendesk, and email, links it to ideas, and supports scoring/prioritization and roadmaps. Overlap on turning feedback into a ranked backlog; differs by relying more on manual linking/scoring vs. Kestral’s automated extraction and follow‑ups Productboard quick start Integrations.
  • Canny: Feedback boards and feature voting with customer segmentation and public status updates. Overlaps on demand signals; differs by being vote‑driven rather than parsing raw calls/transcripts and auto‑routing tasks/projects with follow‑ups Canny features.
  • Dovetail: Research repository that transcribes calls, highlights themes, and generates AI summaries. Overlaps on extracting insights; differs by focusing on research synthesis over creating prioritized engineering tasks and automated customer follow‑ups Dovetail AI.
  • Forethought: AI support platform with multi‑agent triage, tagging, and automated responses/handoffs. Overlaps on classification and automation; differs by focusing on support resolution at scale versus converting feedback into prioritized product work Forethought Triage.
  • Jira Product Discovery (Atlassian): Tooling to capture ideas, prioritize, and push into Jira for delivery. Overlaps on prioritized feeds for product/engineering; differs by living in the Atlassian ecosystem and relying less on AI‑first extraction from raw conversations and automated follow‑ups Atlassian overview.