Kestroll logo

Kestroll

AI Digital Asset Manager

Summer 2025active2025Website
Artificial IntelligenceDesignMarketingAdvertising
Sponsored
Documenso logo

Documenso

Open source e-signing

The open source DocuSign alternative. Beautiful, modern, and built for developers.

Learn more →
?

Your Company Here

Sponsor slot available

Want to be listed as a sponsor? Reach thousands of founders and developers.

Report from 17 days ago

What do they actually do

Kestroll builds an AI‑powered digital/media asset manager for brand, marketing, and creative video teams. It centralizes files, makes them searchable, and adds guardrails for approvals, versions, and brand consistency across channels. The product highlights fast asset search, automated organization, and streamlined review/approval so teams can find the right, approved asset and distribute it with fewer handoffs homepage YC profile.

For video‑heavy workflows, Kestroll emphasizes frame‑level metadata, proxy generation, high‑speed previewing, and help assembling rough cuts from raw footage. The company positions itself as an “AI operating system” for modern brand and marketing teams and focuses on unifying ingestion, review, and delivery in one place blog LinkedIn demo.

Who are their target customer(s)

  • Brand and marketing teams at mid‑to‑large companies running multichannel campaigns: Struggle to quickly find approved assets, keep versions/approvals straight, and enforce brand rules across channels.
  • Video production and creative teams (editors, producers, asset managers): Waste time searching raw footage, creating proxies/previews, and assembling rough cuts from scattered files.
  • Creative and marketing agencies with many clients and distributed reviewers: Spend too much time collecting feedback, reconciling versions, and delivering client‑approved assets on schedule.
  • E‑commerce and social content teams producing many asset variants quickly: Need to stay on‑brand while turning around platform‑specific cuts and captions under tight deadlines.
  • Independent creators and small studios: Face long edit cycles, fragmented storage, and limited tooling to turn raw shoots into publishable content quickly.

How would they acquire their first 10, 50, and 100 customers

  • First 10: Founder‑led, customized pilots with warm YC introductions to brand/marketing teams, post‑production houses, and agencies; tightly scoped implementations that solve a concrete pain (fast asset search, rough‑cut building) in exchange for candid feedback and testimonials YC profile blog.
  • First 50: Productize the best pilots into a fixed‑scope, paid proof‑of‑value; use case studies and short demo clips for targeted outbound to heads of production/marketing, plus a small paid‑ads test on keywords like “asset search” and “rough cut,” and a referral credit for pilot conversions homepage LinkedIn demo.
  • First 100: Add channel partnerships (post‑production vendors, agency networks, creative tool marketplaces) and a lightweight self‑serve onboarding path with common workflow templates; standardize onboarding and success metrics to drive expansion and references homepage blog.

What is the rough total addressable market

Top-down context:

The core markets are Digital Asset Management (DAM) and Media Asset Management (MAM), with adjacent spend in audio/video editing and creative‑ops tools. 2024 estimates: DAM ≈ $4.9B Grand View Research, MAM ≈ $1.8B Meticulous Research.

Bottom-up calculation:

Core TAM (DAM + MAM) ≈ $6.6B in 2024. Including audio & video editing software (~$3.2B, 2022 baseline) brings a practical expanded TAM to roughly $9.8–10.0B Insight Partners. Looking ahead, DAM is projected to ~ $12B by 2030 and MAM to ~ $5.7B, implying ~$17–18B combined before considering overlapping adjacent categories Grand View Meticulous.

Assumptions:

  • Core TAM counts DAM and MAM without double‑counting adjacent software.
  • Expanded TAM assumes Kestroll replaces or displaces part of editing/creative‑ops spend for targeted teams.
  • 2030 projections are based on cited reports and do not add overlapping adjacent categories.

Who are some of their notable competitors

  • Bynder: Enterprise DAM for centralizing marketing files, permissions, approvals, and multichannel delivery; overlaps on brand governance, version control, and distribution.
  • Frame.io (Adobe): Video‑first collaboration and review (including camera‑to‑cloud ingest, proxies, frame‑level comments, approvals); overlaps on ingest, proxy workflows, and production reviews.
  • Cloudinary: Media management and delivery with automated transformations and platform‑specific variants via APIs; overlaps on fast previews, automated variants, and programmatic distribution.
  • Acquia DAM (Widen): Enterprise DAM with configurable workflows, templates, analytics, and integrations; competes on strict brand controls and large‑scale media workflows.
  • Brandfolder: Brand‑centric DAM emphasizing versioning, templating, embeddable assets, and controlled external sharing; competes on version control and cross‑team distribution.