Leaping AI logo

Leaping AI

Voice AI agents to automate call centers (digital call center workers)

Winter 2025active2025Website
B2BAIConversational AI
Sponsored
Documenso logo

Documenso

Open source e-signing

The open source DocuSign alternative. Beautiful, modern, and built for developers.

Learn more →
?

Your Company Here

Sponsor slot available

Want to be listed as a sponsor? Reach thousands of founders and developers.

Report from 5 days ago

What do they actually do

Leaping AI builds voice-based AI agents that answer and handle customer phone calls for routine tasks. The agents plug into a company’s existing phone system (SIP/VoIP or cloud telephony), greet callers, follow scripted or intent-driven conversations, and complete simple actions like checking order status, scheduling callbacks, or updating records when connected to CRMs and support tools.

When the request is too complex or the model is uncertain, the call is transferred to a human agent along with a brief summary to speed up the handoff. The service runs in the cloud with an admin UI for call routing rules, transcripts, and analytics, and typically involves an onboarding period to tune scripts and intents.

Today the product is best at structured, repetitive calls and is deployed with conservative scope and clear escalation paths. It is less suited to multi-step troubleshooting, ambiguous requests, or highly regulated transactions without additional safeguards and human oversight.

Who are their target customer(s)

  • Contact-center managers at mid-market companies: High volumes of repetitive inbound calls drive long waits and staffing costs. They need to reduce live-agent load without breaking compliance or customer experience.
  • Customer-support leaders at high-volume e-commerce firms: Routine questions slow down agents and create inconsistent answers. They need faster, predictable resolutions for common requests, especially during demand spikes.
  • Small-to-medium businesses with limited support headcount: They can’t staff phones 24/7, so calls go to voicemail or hold after hours. Missed calls hurt sales and trust, and a few employees are overextended.
  • Billing/collections teams and subscription services: Most outreach is scripted status or payment calls that are costly to scale and carry compliance risk. They need accurate records and clear escalation while lowering manual effort.
  • IT/telephony ops and platform owners using VoIP/SIP: New automation must integrate cleanly with existing phone systems and be reliable. They want minimal engineering burden, strong uptime, and smooth handoff to humans.

How would they acquire their first 10, 50, and 100 customers

  • First 10: Founder-led, concierge pilots with mid-market contact centers and e-commerce/billing teams via networks and targeted outreach; engineers handle integrations, CS tunes scripts, and pilots report containment and handoff quality.
  • First 50: Package the pilot playbook into repeatable onboarding with reusable scripts and integrations, publish 3–4 case studies, run targeted outbound to mid-market buyers, and announce integrations with major telephony/CRM platforms.
  • First 100: Launch a self-serve tier with templates, add reseller/referral deals with telephony vendors and BPOs, stand up a small field-sales team for larger accounts, and drive inbound through ROI content, webinars, and conference presence.

What is the rough total addressable market

Top-down context:

The TAM is the portion of global contact-center spend that can shift from human phone handling to automated voice agents and related hosting/integration fees. In plain terms, it’s the budget for phone work that AI can reliably take over.

Bottom-up calculation:

Model as A × (B × C), where A = addressable organizations, B = FTE-equivalents of phone work per org, and C = annual price to automate one FTE. Example scenarios: 30k×3×$10k ≈ $0.9B; 200k×5×$12k ≈ $12B; 500k×8×$15k ≈ $60B per year.

Assumptions:

  • Counts of addressable orgs reflect companies with meaningful phone support (US-only to global depending on scenario).
  • Per-FTE annual price includes minutes, speech, integrations, support, and amortized onboarding.
  • Containment rates are sufficient to replace the modeled FTE-equivalents without harming service levels.

Who are some of their notable competitors

  • Replicant: Offers autonomous voice agents that handle routine contact-center calls end to end with escalation to humans, directly overlapping with Leaping AI’s use cases.
  • Google Contact Center AI (CCAI): An enterprise platform for virtual agents, speech, and agent-assist that integrates into existing contact-center stacks; competes on scale and ecosystem fit.
  • Cognigy: A conversational automation platform with strong enterprise integrations and voice/IVR capabilities, used to build virtual agents and replace legacy IVRs.
  • Talkdesk: Cloud contact-center platform that bundles telephony, routing, and AI; appeals to buyers seeking an all-in-one system with built-in virtual agent features.
  • Netomi: AI customer service automation across chat, email, and voice integrations focused on automated resolutions and reducing agent workload across channels.