Mesmer logo

Mesmer

Cursor for CTOs

Spring 2025active2025Website
Artificial IntelligenceSaaSProductivityTeam CollaborationAI
Sponsored
Documenso logo

Documenso

Open source e-signing

The open source DocuSign alternative. Beautiful, modern, and built for developers.

Learn more →
?

Your Company Here

Sponsor slot available

Want to be listed as a sponsor? Reach thousands of founders and developers.

Report from 16 days ago

What do they actually do

Mesmer is a cloud service that connects to a company’s existing engineering tools (GitHub/GitLab/Bitbucket, Jira/Linear, Slack, Figma). It ingests real activity across code, issues, designs, and meetings, then produces weekly reports, daily summaries, real‑time alerts, and ad‑hoc Q&A so leaders can see what shipped, what’s blocked, and where risk is rising without changing team workflows mesmer.co / YC launch.

The product runs with read‑only access and advertises enterprise security controls (SOC‑2 level) mesmer.co. Mesmer reports it is live with multiple customers (10+ companies, collectively valued in the billions) and has processed tens of millions of lines of code during onboarding/testing YC launch.

Who are their target customer(s)

  • Seed‑to‑Series A CTO juggling hiring and roadmap decisions: Spends time chasing status and running ad‑hoc check‑ins; needs a single, trusted summary of what shipped and what’s blocked to free up time for strategy. YC launch
  • VP of Engineering at a growing product company with multiple repos and trackers: Lacks a consolidated, current view across Git, issues, design, and chat, so risks surface late and require manual synthesis. mesmer.co
  • Engineering manager responsible for several teams: Can’t easily see who’s overloaded or which PRs/tickets are stalled, leading to time spent coordinating instead of unblocking. YC launch
  • CTO/founder who must explain delivery tradeoffs and delays: Needs grounded, code‑level answers to "why" questions (e.g., why a project is slipping) but current signals are noisy and lack context. YC launch
  • Security‑conscious CTO at a mid/enterprise org: Wants visibility without adding process overhead or risking sensitive data; requires read‑only integrations and enterprise security controls. mesmer.co

How would they acquire their first 10, 50, and 100 customers

  • First 10: Use warm intros (YC alumni, angels, founder referrals) to run high‑touch pilots with Seed‑to‑Series A CTOs; concierge onboarding that connects their stack and delivers weekly reports/alerts in a few weeks, with read‑only and SOC‑2 materials provided up front.
  • First 50: Turn pilot results into case studies; targeted outbound to VPs of Engineering and growth teams plus live demos/webinars showing reduced status meetings. Package playbooks and prebuilt connectors so one CS resource can run many concurrent trials; lean on inbound from content/PR.
  • First 100: Add channels/marketplaces (Git/GitHub and issue‑tracker ecosystems) and partnerships with dev consultancies; hire a small enterprise sales team for mid‑market with procurement‑ready contracts. Automate onboarding and offer a low‑friction self‑serve path that feeds product‑led signups into sales/CS.

What is the rough total addressable market

Top-down context:

Global developer count is ~27M in 2024. At $100–$600 per developer per year (in line with engineering analytics pricing), implied TAM ranges roughly from ~$2.7B to ~$16.2B Evans Data / Waydev / LinearB / Haystack.

Bottom-up calculation:

Per‑developer lens: 27M × $300/yr ≈ $8.1B; 27M × $600/yr ≈ $16.2B. Enterprise lens: if targeting orgs averaging $30k ACV, 135k–540k addressable orgs implies ~$4.1B–$16.2B, depending on team size thresholds Evans Data / Vendr ACV benchmarks.

Assumptions:

  • Uses Evans Data’s ~27M developer estimate (2024).
  • Pricing comparable to engineering analytics tools (~$200–$600 per developer per year).
  • Addressable org count varies with minimum team size targeted (e.g., >50 or >200 engineers).

Who are some of their notable competitors

  • LinearB: Engineering metrics and workflow automation focused on team performance and delivery insights; publishes per‑contributor pricing that sets a reference band pricing.
  • Waydev: Engineering analytics from Git and ticket data; well‑known in per‑developer pricing model and DORA‑style reporting pricing.
  • Haystack: Developer productivity metrics and alerts built on Git/issue data, targeting reduced bottlenecks and clearer delivery signals pricing.
  • Jellyfish: Engineering management platform that ties engineering work to business outcomes, used by larger product orgs for portfolio visibility.
  • Code Climate Velocity: Engineering analytics product providing delivery metrics and team health insights for technology organizations.