Parse logo

Parse

Build an API to interact with any website in seconds.

Fall 2025active2025Website
Developer ToolsAPIBig Data
Sponsored
Documenso logo

Documenso

Open source e-signing

The open source DocuSign alternative. Beautiful, modern, and built for developers.

Learn more →
?

Your Company Here

Sponsor slot available

Want to be listed as a sponsor? Reach thousands of founders and developers.

Report from 27 days ago

What do they actually do

Parse lets you turn a live web page into a programmable API in seconds. You submit a URL and a plain‑English description of the data you want, and their system analyzes the page, builds an extractor, and returns structured JSON via an HTTP endpoint. There’s a dashboard for running jobs, live editing with an AI assistant, scheduling, and versioning Parse homepage.

The product is live with public sign‑ups and a developer‑facing API. The company positions its backend as “browserless” (no headless browser required) and focused on fast, reliable extraction, though the founders have noted active work on scale and anti‑blocking as usage grows Parse homepageYC profilefounder posts.

Who are their target customer(s)

  • Data engineers ingesting web data into pipelines: Need a programmatic way to turn pages into JSON without building and maintaining scraping infrastructure. Current pain is brittle browser automations, scale limits, site defenses, and cost Parse homepageYC profile.
  • Growth/sales teams building lead lists or refreshing prospects: Need fast, repeatable exports from many sites. Current pain is manual copy/paste or flaky scrapers that break and slow outreach Parse homepageYC profile.
  • Marketplaces and aggregators (price comparison, travel, real estate): Need frequent, large‑scale updates of listings, prices, and availability. Current pain is operating browser fleets at scale, coping with layout changes, and blocking that makes data unreliable Parse homepage.
  • Small engineering teams and indie developers: Need to extract structured data quickly without devops or scraper maintenance. Current pain is the time and expertise required to host scrapers and selectors, which slows product work Parse homepage.
  • Compliance, brand, and security monitoring teams: Need consistent, scheduled checks with high reliability to avoid missing incidents. Current pain is rate‑limits and blocking that cause flaky runs; the founders have said they’re addressing this as usage scales founder posts.

How would they acquire their first 10, 50, and 100 customers

  • First 10: Founder‑led outreach to early signups and personal networks; set up bespoke extractors, hand‑hold onboarding, and personally fix reliability issues until each customer has a working API at their required scale.
  • First 50: Lean on product‑led growth: ship how‑tos and one‑click templates for popular sites, seed developer communities, and add simple referral/credit flows to let users share working endpoints.
  • First 100: Introduce short paid pilots and an SMB rep to run demos and onboarding; add webhooks, warehouse connectors, and team billing so larger buyers can plug Parse into pipelines with minimal engineering.

What is the rough total addressable market

Top-down context:

Core market (commercial web‑scraping/web‑data‑extraction software) is roughly $0.7–1.1B in 2024–2025, growing low‑to‑mid teens CAGR Mordor IntelligenceMarket.us. Broader data‑extraction is ~>$1.7B, and data‑integration/ETL is much larger (~$15B+) as an upper bound ResearchAndMarketsGrand View Research.

Bottom-up calculation:

If ~35,000 organizations worldwide actively pay for web‑origin data extraction and spend about $20,000 per year on tools/services, the addressable spend is roughly $700M; at 50,000 orgs at the same spend, it’s about $1B. This lines up with published estimates for the web‑scraping software category.

Assumptions:

  • Tens of thousands of orgs globally have ongoing web‑data needs significant enough to pay vendors rather than build in‑house.
  • Average annual spend per org for web‑extraction tools/services is ~$20k (mix of SMBs and mid‑market/enterprise).
  • Spend is attributable to software/services like Parse (not double‑counting unrelated ETL spend).

Who are some of their notable competitors

  • Browse AI: No‑code tool to “turn any website into an API,” with visual setup, scheduling, webhooks, and anti‑detection features. Notable for its simplicity and website‑to‑API positioning similar to Parse Browse AIDocs.
  • Diffbot: ML/vision‑driven automatic extraction that classifies pages and returns structured JSON, with crawl and knowledge‑graph products. Notable for high‑quality schemaed data at scale Extract docs.
  • Apify: Developer platform for building and hosting custom scrapers/automations (“Actors”), with a marketplace and proxy options. Notable for flexibility and developer control vs. Parse’s instant API model Docs.
  • Zyte (Scrapinghub): Enterprise scraping and managed data with advanced proxy/anti‑ban tooling (Zyte API/Smart Proxy Manager) and managed feeds. Notable for reliability at large scale Zyte API.
  • ScrapingBee: API‑first service that renders pages, rotates proxies, and returns HTML/JSON for lightweight extraction. Notable for simplicity and small‑team use cases Docs.