QualGent logo

QualGent

AI Mobile App Quality Assurance Tester

Spring 2025active2025Website
Artificial IntelligenceB2BAI
Sponsored
Documenso logo

Documenso

Open source e-signing

The open source DocuSign alternative. Beautiful, modern, and built for developers.

Learn more →
?

Your Company Here

Sponsor slot available

Want to be listed as a sponsor? Reach thousands of founders and developers.

Report from 16 days ago

What do they actually do

QualGent provides a hosted, AI-driven mobile QA service that runs tests on real iOS and Android devices in the cloud. Teams upload their APK/IPA via a dashboard or REST API, write test intents in plain English (or use the UI), queue runs across selected devices, and receive videos, screenshots, logs, and structured pass/fail results for each test run qualgent.ai api.qualgent.ai/docs.

Instead of brittle scripts, QualGent uses a vision-based, self-healing agent that interprets intent and drives the app like a user (taps, swipes, text entry, popup handling). It integrates with CI/CD so runs can be automated on builds, and the API supports uploading apps, listing devices, queuing/monitoring runs, and retrieving results. The product is live with a public dashboard, API, and early customers referenced in launch materials qualgent.ai api.qualgent.ai/docs YC listing.

Who are their target customer(s)

  • Early-stage mobile startup developers shipping their own app: They spend time manually testing and fixing fragile scripts instead of building features, leading to slow releases and missed edge cases.
  • QA engineers at small-to-medium product teams: They maintain brittle UI tests and chase flaky results across devices/OS versions, making regression testing slow and unreliable.
  • Product managers at consumer apps: They worry about regressions breaking signup, onboarding, or payments, which hurts conversion and ratings; manual checks often miss issues before release.
  • Mobile teams in regulated or transaction-heavy companies (fintech, healthcare, e-commerce): They need trustworthy end-to-end checks for payments, OTPs, and sensitive flows on real devices, but current QA is fragmented and lacks realistic coverage.
  • Agencies and consultancies delivering multiple client apps: Maintaining device farms and manual test cycles is costly and slows delivery, increasing the risk of launch-day bugs across many projects.

How would they acquire their first 10, 50, and 100 customers

  • First 10: Personally onboard warm leads (YC founders, beta signups, developer contacts) with a free pilot: QualGent runs tests on their app and delivers a defect report within 48 hours, then converts pilots to paid by wiring results into their CI.
  • First 50: Leverage word-of-mouth and agency/CI partnerships; place trial credits in developer workflows, publish short case studies and copy-paste onboarding recipes so small teams can self-serve after a pilot.
  • First 100: Add a small sales/partner team to close mid-sized and regulated buyers with short SLAs and reseller deals; automate signup, upload, and billing, and use packaged case studies and reference calls to reduce evaluation time.

What is the rough total addressable market

Top-down context:

The immediate market—mobile device testing/device-cloud—is estimated around $2.1–$2.7B in 2024, which directly matches QualGent’s hosted real-device testing offering MarketIntelo/DataIntelo. Adjacent cloud testing is roughly $14B, with the broader software testing/automation market in the tens of billions TBRC Fortune Business Insights Mordor Intelligence.

Bottom-up calculation:

Starting from ~$2.1B device-cloud spend, assume large enterprises account for ~70% of revenue and SMBs/startups ~30%, yielding an immediately reachable SMB SAM of roughly $600–700M for a YC-stage product focused on smaller teams (0.30 × $2.1B) MarketIntelo Precedence Research.

Assumptions:

  • Mobile device-cloud market size is ~$2.1B baseline for near-term TAM.
  • SMBs/startups represent ~30% of device-cloud spend; enterprises ~70%.
  • QualGent initially targets SMB/startups lacking large QA orgs before moving upmarket.

Who are some of their notable competitors

  • BrowserStack: Cloud real-device testing that runs Appium/Espresso/XCUITest suites at scale with videos/logs; strong if you already have scripted tests, but it centers on executing scripts rather than natural-language agents docs.
  • Sauce Labs: Real-device and emulator/simulator cloud for standard automation frameworks with CI integration; focuses on scaling scripted runs and diagnostics over vision-based NL agents docs.
  • Firebase Test Lab (Google): Low-cost cloud test execution integrated with Firebase/Android Studio and CI; runs framework-based tests on Google-managed devices, not autonomous self-healing agents docs.
  • Kobiton: Mobile device cloud with scriptless/AI-augmented features (session recording, Appium generation, self-healing claims); closer on convenience but oriented around recorded sessions and AI-assisted scripts vs. pure NL agents overview.
  • HeadSpin: Enterprise real-device cloud combining functional tests with deep performance/QoE analytics across global devices/networks; competes on infrastructure and observability more than NL, agentic testing docs.