Red Barn Robotics logo

Red Barn Robotics

A Roomba for weeds on a farm.

Winter 2025active2025Website
Sponsored
Documenso logo

Documenso

Open source e-signing

The open source DocuSign alternative. Beautiful, modern, and built for developers.

Learn more →
?

Your Company Here

Sponsor slot available

Want to be listed as a sponsor? Reach thousands of founders and developers.

Report from 11 days ago

What do they actually do

Red Barn Robotics provides a weeding-as-a-service offering for commercial farms using its autonomous, lightweight Field Hand robot. Instead of selling hardware, they map a grower’s fields, create a custom weeding schedule, bring their robot(s) on-site, and run regular intra‑row weeding passes through the season company website YC page.

The service targets farms that currently rely on hand crews or want to reduce herbicide use. The Field Hand operates autonomously within crop rows so growers don’t need to drive or guide it, and Red Barn handles the planning and on‑farm operations as a recurring service company website.

Who are their target customer(s)

  • Mid‑size commercial row/vegetable grower who hires seasonal hand crews: They face labor shortages and high recurring costs for hand crews; missed or late weeding passes reduce yields and marketable product company website YC page.
  • Organic or low‑chemical grower: They can’t rely on herbicides; manual weeding is slow and expensive, and keeping consistent weed control across the season is a major operational burden company website YC page.
  • Specialty/high‑value crop grower (berries, transplant beds, market vegetables): They need precise intra‑row weeding; hand crews can be error‑prone and slow, and crop damage from imprecise weeding hurts both yield and quality.
  • Farm operations manager or owner running multiple fields: Coordinating crews, training, and scheduling across fields is time‑consuming and creates variability that complicates harvest planning and labor budgets company website.
  • Small‑acreage intensive or contract grower: They can’t justify a full‑time weeding crew and need a cost‑effective seasonal service to keep beds clean during peak weed periods YC page.

How would they acquire their first 10, 50, and 100 customers

  • First 10: Founder‑led pilots with nearby mid‑size and organic growers who currently hire hand crews; run short discounted or pay‑per‑acre trials early in season, map fields, perform scheduled passes, and capture before/after data for case studies company website YC page.
  • First 50: Host regional demo days timed before planting, convert pilots to season contracts, and incentivize referrals; standardize onboarding (mapping → schedule → recurring runs) and package outcomes into one‑page ROI materials for co‑ops, consultants, and dealers company website.
  • First 100: Establish 1–2 regional hubs with operators and spare robots, add channel partners (service contractors, ag‑suppliers), and offer simple seasonal pricing with per‑acre billing; target crops/regions using pilot data and optimize routing to lower per‑acre costs company website YC page.

What is the rough total addressable market

Top-down context:

US vegetable acreage is ~4.3M acres (2022 Census). If every acre required intra‑row hand‑weeding, annual spend at $50–$300/acre implies roughly $215M–$1.29B/year USDA NASS 2022 vegetables. Published cost studies show wide ranges, from ~$50/acre to $150–$500+/acre depending on crop and region UC ANR Carbon Robotics case study.

Bottom-up calculation:

If Red Barn serves 25% of vegetable acres (~1.075M acres), revenue at $150–$300/acre is ~$161M–$323M/year. A smaller early rollout at 5% (~215k acres) is ~$32M–$64M/year at the same pricing USDA NASS.

Assumptions:

  • Only a subset of vegetable acres need intra‑row hand weeding (organic, specialty, transplant beds) and are operationally reachable.
  • Per‑acre weeding costs and prices vary widely by crop, weed pressure, and region; $150–$300/acre is a reasonable service range for many targeted crops UC ANR.
  • Service logistics (fleet size, hubs, routing) constrain near‑term coverage and conversion of SAM into revenue.

Who are some of their notable competitors

  • FarmWise: Builder of the Vulcan tractor‑pulled intra‑row weeder; originally ran weeding‑as‑a‑service and now focuses on selling large implements. Recently went through a restructuring/transition; overlaps on specialty vegetables and replacing hand crews product restructuring coverage.
  • Carbon Robotics: Sells the LaserWeeder, which uses computer vision and lasers to kill weeds without herbicides; targets larger specialty and row‑crop operations and competes to reduce labor and chemicals site industry report.
  • Naïo Technologies: European maker of small autonomous field robots (OZ, TED, ORIO) and related services; overlaps with specialty growers but mainly sells machines via dealers, with more established presence in Europe OZ TED.
  • Ecorobotix: Offers the ARA AI spot‑sprayer for plant‑by‑plant treatment, reducing chemical use; an alternative to hand weeding but based on targeted spraying rather than mechanical removal ARA company.
  • Small Robot Company: UK company providing per‑plant monitoring and treatment as a service (Tom robot). Similar service model but focused on arable mapping and targeted actuation vs. simple on‑farm weeding passes overview Tom V4.