Reditus Space logo

Reditus Space

Reusable Satellites for zero-g manufacturing

Winter 2025active2025Website
Hard TechManufacturingAerospace
Sponsored
Documenso logo

Documenso

Open source e-signing

The open source DocuSign alternative. Beautiful, modern, and built for developers.

Learn more →
?

Your Company Here

Sponsor slot available

Want to be listed as a sponsor? Reach thousands of founders and developers.

Report from 11 days ago

What do they actually do

Reditus Space is developing ENOS, a small reusable satellite and re-entry capsule that takes manufacturing payloads to low Earth orbit, runs them in microgravity, and returns both the finished product and the vehicle to Earth for recovery and reuse. The company is development-stage: it shows hardware tests and a propulsion partnership with Dawn Aerospace but does not yet operate routine commercial flights or list paying customers publicly (ENOS; About/news; Dawn partnership).

Near term, Reditus aims to fly its first full orbital recovery mission in Q2 2026 to prove the end-to-end “up, manufacture, and back” profile, after prior suborbital/drop testing in 2025. If that succeeds, the plan is to convert early demos into recurring missions focused on microgravity manufacturing use cases that need predictable, fast downmass (YC profile; About/news; ENOS overview).

Who are their target customer(s)

  • Pharma and biologics R&D teams: They want purer crystals or novel cell/biologic products from microgravity but current return options are slow, expensive, and unpredictable, making iterative development hard to plan (ENOS; Dawn press).
  • Advanced materials developers (fibers, alloys, precision optics): They need true microgravity to change material properties but can’t run fast experiment cycles because today’s return options are infrequent, often single-use, and carry high per-sample costs and risk (ENOS; Specter Insights).
  • University and government labs running space experiments: They face limited flight opportunities, long scheduling lead times, and complex downmass logistics to get physical samples back for analysis (About/FAQ).
  • Space/hardware companies qualifying microgravity-made parts: They lack a repeatable, low-risk way to return small parts quickly for inspection and certification before scaling production (ENOS).
  • Early-stage product startups for microgravity-made goods: One-off demo flights are too slow and costly to find product–market fit or iterate quickly on space-made products (YC profile).

How would they acquire their first 10, 50, and 100 customers

  • First 10: Directly recruit university labs, small pharma/biologics groups, and materials startups already pursuing microgravity work; offer co-funded pilot slots and waived integration fees on the first orbital recovery demo to generate physical results and case studies (ENOS; About/tests).
  • First 50: Convert pilots into paid repeats by running a small schedule of follow-on flights with standardized payload racks and turnkey integration; publish recovery timelines/sample quality metrics and lean on the Dawn Aerospace propulsion partnership for credibility in sales (ENOS; Dawn press).
  • First 100: Productize ops (self-serve booking, standard interfaces, vetted integrators) and sell multi-mission contracts/volume pricing to CROs, enterprise R&D, and space hardware firms; pair with confirmed launch/insurance partners and use published mission data and recovered-sample case studies as proof of predictability (YC profile; ENOS).

What is the rough total addressable market

Top-down context:

The in‑space manufacturing/microgravity research market is in the low billions today and projected to reach the tens of billions by the 2030s; downmass/logistics is a meaningful slice of that spend (GMI Insights; TBRC microgravity research).

Bottom-up calculation:

If industry-wide there are on the order of 100–300 return missions per year at $1–$3M per return, that implies a $100–$900M downmass revenue pool; higher cadence and larger payloads could push this into the low billions as activity scales (AIAA down‑mass modeling).

Assumptions:

  • Downmass/logistics represents ~10–30% of total in‑space manufacturing/microgravity spend (GMI/TBRC).
  • Average price per return in the $1–$3M range for small, dedicated LEO return missions (illustrative; varies by mass, schedule, and insurance).
  • Industry reaches 100–300 annual returns with growth tied to microgravity use cases (supported directionally by down‑mass demand modeling) (AIAA).

Who are some of their notable competitors