Rescript

What do they actually do

Rescript is an AI workspace for policy and regulatory teams. It continuously monitors federal and state sources (hearings and panel meetings, bills, committee/agency reports, proposed and final rules, and public comments), decides what’s relevant to each customer’s issues without relying on simple keyword lists, and turns dense items into speaker-labeled transcripts, concise summaries, and stakeholder-ready memos that teams can share or export site YC. Customers include government-relations, regulatory-affairs, and compliance teams at enterprises, law firms, lobbying shops, and trade associations; the company publicly claims usage by top-10 lobbying firms, AmLaw 200 firms, and Fortune 100 compliance teams YC site.

Teams onboard by specifying issues and jurisdictions, then Rescript’s system watches target sources and alerts when something that matters shows up. For hearings, it delivers speaker-labeled transcripts and personalized summaries shortly after a meeting ends (public examples cite around a 10-minute turnaround) site LinkedIn. The product is sold via structured enterprise pilots and direct sales; trials are run as scoped pilots rather than self-serve signups site.

Who are their target customer(s)

• Government-relations and lobbying teams at corporations or lobbying firms: They need to spot bills, hearings, and rule changes as they happen and quickly brief stakeholders. Today they scan many sources manually and handwrite summaries, which slows response and risks missed opportunities YC site.
• Regulatory-affairs teams inside regulated companies: They must track agency rulemakings and state-by-state variations that affect product and operational compliance. Current workflows require manual triage across many documents and can leave gaps that create risk site.
• In-house compliance/legal teams at large enterprises and boutique regulatory practices (AmLaw 200): They need accurate hearing transcripts and stakeholder-ready memos so executives can decide fast, but producing these in-house ties up expensive legal time YC LinkedIn.
• Trade association policy analysts: They monitor multiple jurisdictions and must produce member-facing briefs tailored to different industries, but small teams and manual summarization delay guidance to members site.
• Public affairs and communications teams: They prepare statements and updates after hearings and related media coverage; delays and noisy transcripts make timely, accurate responses difficult site LinkedIn.

How would they acquire their first 10, 50, and 100 customers

• First 10: Target marquee buyers (top lobbying shops, AmLaw 200 practices, Fortune 100 compliance teams) with short paid pilots on a specific issue/jurisdiction that guarantee rapid post-hearing summaries/transcripts; use YC intros and founder outreach to convert pilots into references YC site.
• First 50: Turn early wins into case studies and referrals; hire 1–2 industry-focused reps (e.g., healthcare, energy, finance) to run a standardized pilot motion with clear ROI metrics and fast onboarding. Add targeted webinars and co-hosted briefings with associations to drive warm leads site YC.
• First 100: Scale through channel partners (trade associations, compliance-platform resellers, regulatory consultancies) and productize integrations (Slack/Teams, document systems). Add enterprise sales features (security, single-tenant options) and a self-serve SME tier for smaller shops site YC.

What is the rough total addressable market

Top-down context:

Budgets for policy influence and compliance are large: U.S. federal lobbying spend hit a record ~$4.4B in 2024, indicating strong and growing investment in government affairs tools and workflows OpenSecrets. Adjacent software markets are sizable: GRC software was ~$21B in 2025 Mordor Intelligence, and public affairs/advocacy software is estimated around $1–3B globally in the mid-2020s SkyQuest TechSci.

Bottom-up calculation:

Initial US-focused account count: ~2,435 registered lobbying firms Bloomberg Government, ~1,000 large enterprises (Fortune 1000), ~200 AmLaw 200 firms, and a subset of ~3,000 policy-active trade/professional associations (out of ~67k total) ASAE ≈ ~6,600 targets. At an average $40k annual contract (enterprise pilots, multi-seat), this implies a US SAM of ~$260M; global expansion and mid-market tiers could plausibly 2–3x that over time.

Assumptions:

• Only a subset of associations are active buyers (≈5% of total).
• Average contract value around $40k reflects multi-seat enterprise pilots with workflow outputs (transcripts, memos) rather than monitoring-only SKUs.
• US-first focus; global policy teams expand the reachable market by 2–3x as coverage and languages/local sources are added.

Who are some of their notable competitors

• FiscalNote: Policy and regulatory intelligence platform covering federal, state, and local levels with alerts, analysis, and workflows; widely used by government affairs teams. Direct overlap on monitoring and relevance filtering.
• Quorum: Public affairs software with legislative tracking, stakeholder management, and advocacy tools. Competes on monitoring and team workflows for GR/PA teams.
• Bloomberg Government (BGov): Federal policy intelligence, news, and analytics for government-affairs professionals. Strong content and data; overlaps on tracking and briefings for policy teams.
• LexisNexis State Net: State legislative and regulatory tracking with alerts and analysis. Overlaps on state coverage and monitoring for legal/regulatory teams.
• Thomson Reuters Regulatory Intelligence: Regulatory change monitoring and analysis, especially for financial services compliance. Overlaps on regulatory tracking and compliance workflows.