Sim logo

Sim

Open source platform to build AI agent workflows

Spring 2025active2025Website
Artificial Intelligence
Sponsored
Documenso logo

Documenso

Open source e-signing

The open source DocuSign alternative. Beautiful, modern, and built for developers.

Learn more →
?

Your Company Here

Sponsor slot available

Want to be listed as a sponsor? Reach thousands of founders and developers.

Report from 15 days ago

What do they actually do

Sim is an open-source platform for building and deploying AI agent workflows. Teams use a visual, drag‑and‑drop canvas to connect AI models, databases, APIs, and common SaaS tools to create chatbots, internal automations, and data-processing flows without wiring everything from scratch (docs).

The product can run in Sim’s cloud or be self‑hosted via Docker/NPM, with support for local models through Ollama for teams that can’t send data to external APIs (GitHub, docs — deployment options). It includes a built‑in Copilot for generating and editing nodes and ships with integrations to dozens of services and vector databases to keep answers grounded in company data (docs — visual editor, Copilot, integrations).

Who are their target customer(s)

  • Startup engineers building agent-driven features (chatbots, automations): They spend weeks gluing models, APIs, and databases, then fight brittle code and breaking changes in models/connectors. They want faster iteration and a stable runtime (docs, GitHub).
  • Product managers and non‑engineering PMs: They need to prototype and validate ideas quickly without waiting on engineering, ideally with a visual/no‑code way to assemble and test workflows (docs — visual editor & no‑code).
  • Customer support and operations leads: They want to automate repetitive tickets and knowledge lookups but struggle to reliably connect docs, inboxes, and messaging tools while keeping answers grounded in company data (docs — integrations & vector DBs).
  • Security/infra teams at data‑sensitive companies: They must keep data on‑prem or use local models and need a self‑hosted option that works with enterprise deployments and avoids sending sensitive data to external APIs (docs — deployment options, GitHub — self‑hosted setup).
  • Agencies and automation consultancies: They build bespoke client workflows and need reusable templates, collaboration, and predictable performance without re‑implementing foundations for each client (docs — templates, team features, homepage — plans).

How would they acquire their first 10, 50, and 100 customers

  • First 10: Directly convert engaged open‑source users and YC/startup network by personal outreach to GitHub stargazers/contributors and offering free pairing and ready‑to‑run templates (chatbot, ticket automation) to get them live quickly (docs, GitHub).
  • First 50: Run weekly workshops/office hours and template‑based hackathons for common stacks (e.g., Zendesk, Slack, Postgres, vector DBs), and turn power users/agencies into implementation partners with reproducible starter projects (docs — integrations & templates).
  • First 100: Productize onboarding for security‑sensitive buyers with hardened self‑host guides and paid pilot support; pair this with targeted dev/support community demand‑gen and channel deals with consultancies and vector‑DB/LLM vendors.

What is the rough total addressable market

Top-down context:

Relevant near‑term categories include AI agents (~$5.4B in 2024), low‑code/no‑code (~$34.7B in 2024), RPA (~$3.79B in 2024), AI code/dev tools (~$6.04B in 2024), and chatbots (~$1.4B in 2025), summing to roughly $51B but with heavy overlap (AI agents, low‑code, RPA, AI code tools, chatbots).

Bottom-up calculation:

A conservative serviceable slice focused on agent workflows for builders, PMs, support, and infra teams is estimated at 10%–25% of the ~$51B blended figure, or about $5.1B–$12.8B in the near term ([sources above]).

Assumptions:

  • Significant overlap exists across low‑code, RPA, chatbots, and agent tools; only a subset is relevant to agent‑workflow platforms.
  • Buyer focus is on teams building AI/agentic automations, excluding non‑AI low‑code and pure UI‑only RPA use cases.
  • Adoption of integrated agent‑workflow platforms grows but remains a minority of total adjacent spend in the near term.

Who are some of their notable competitors

  • LangChain: Developer‑first framework for LLM apps/agents with extensive integrations and observability via LangSmith; powerful but code‑first, so teams wanting visual/no‑code editors must add that layer themselves (LangChain agents).
  • Flowise: Open‑source, visual LangChain‑based builder for LLM workflows (RAG, multi‑agent, self‑hosted). Competes directly for teams wanting quick visual prototypes and self‑hosting (site, GitHub).
  • n8n: Open‑source workflow automation with growing AI/agent nodes and many integrations; strong general automation, but not purpose‑built for agent observability and patterns (AI agents, integrations).
  • Replit (Agent): Hosted product that turns natural‑language prompts into apps/agents and handles deployment; optimized for fast build‑and‑ship rather than an embeddable, open‑source workflow platform (Replit AI).
  • Botpress: Open‑source conversational AI studio with a visual flow builder and RAG; focused on customer‑facing assistants and support automations with self‑host/enterprise options (RAG guide, getting started).