Solidroad logo

Solidroad

AI agents for CX teams, starting with training and QA.

Winter 2025active2024Website
Sponsored
Documenso logo

Documenso

Open source e-signing

The open source DocuSign alternative. Beautiful, modern, and built for developers.

Learn more →
?

Your Company Here

Sponsor slot available

Want to be listed as a sponsor? Reach thousands of founders and developers.

Report from 4 days ago

What do they actually do

Solidroad sells a SaaS product for customer-facing teams that automates two jobs: it reviews 100% of customer conversations against customizable scorecards (Auto‑QA), and it generates AI role‑play simulations so agents can practice on scenarios that mirror real interactions Solidroad Quality, Solidroad Training.

Teams connect phone, chat, email, and CRM/inbox tools (including an Intercom app) so Solidroad can ingest recordings/tickets, score them, and turn recurring issues into targeted practice. Managers get dashboards to prioritize coaching; the same signals can also feed suggestions to improve deployed chatbots/voice bots Solidroad homepage, Intercom app listing, Solidroad Quality, Solidroad Training.

Public materials say Solidroad works with 50+ customers and analyzes hundreds of thousands of conversations per month; named customers include Podium and Crypto.com. The company also advertises SOC 2 and ISO 27001 compliance and provides onboarding support Seed announcement, Silicon Republic, Podium case, Solidroad homepage.

Who are their target customer(s)

  • Head of Customer Experience / Contact Center Director: Accountable for CSAT, AHT, and new-hire ramp, but can only spot-check a small share of interactions. Misses recurring issues that drive poor outcomes and needs a way to surface and address them quickly.
  • QA / Quality Assurance Manager: Manually scores a sample of interactions and struggles to find patterns at scale. Needs automated coverage and prioritized insights that translate directly into coaching actions.
  • Learning & Development / Training Lead: Lacks scalable, realistic practice tied to actual mistakes agents make. Needs targeted simulations that shorten ramp time and improve real-world handling of scenarios.
  • Product Manager / Bot Owner (AI/chatbot ops): Needs reliable detection of bot regressions and failure modes, and a safe way to feed conversational insights back into models without breaking production.
  • Operations / Security Lead at enterprise customers: Concerned about vendor risk, data handling, and compliance when integrating into phone/chat/email systems. Needs certifications, auditability, and clear implementation support.

How would they acquire their first 10, 50, and 100 customers

  • First 10: Run short, paid pilots with CX/QA/L&D teams that plug into existing tools (e.g., Intercom) to show quick wins on ramp time, AHT, or CSAT, then convert into referenceable case studies.
  • First 50: Build a repeatable outbound/inbound motion targeting SaaS, fintech, and retail CX orgs; standardize a 30–60 day pilot (integration, scorecards, simulations) to prove value and publish concrete QA/L&D playbooks to capture inbound.
  • First 100: Leverage CCaaS/CRM marketplaces and bot vendor partnerships for channel installs; add a low‑touch pilot path to land smaller teams and expand via coaching outcomes, while using enterprise security/compliance to speed larger deals.

What is the rough total addressable market

Top-down context:

The global contact center software market was ~$33.4B in 2023, with contact center analytics estimated around ~$2.4B in 2024—Solidroad targets the QA/analytics/training slice within these categories Grand View Research, Market Research Future.

Bottom-up calculation:

Approximately 17M contact center agents globally suggests a large seat-based opportunity; assuming an initial serviceable segment of ~5M agents paying ~$60/seat/month implies ~$3.6B/year TAM. For context, there are ~2.86M contact center employees in the U.S. alone Plivo citing Gartner, Zoom citing Statista.

Assumptions:

  • Seat-based pricing around $40–$80 per agent per month for Auto‑QA + simulation training.
  • Initial serviceable segment ~30% of global agents (focus on mid‑market/enterprise, English or major-language support, modern stacks).
  • Adoption concentrated in teams handling voice/chat with measurable QA/training workflows.

Who are some of their notable competitors

  • Observe.ai: Conversation intelligence and automated QA with real‑time agent assist; overlaps on auto‑scoring and coaching workflows for voice/chat.
  • Cresta: AI coaching and AI agents for CX (real‑time assist plus post‑interaction coaching); competes on using conversation signals to coach humans and improve AI agents.
  • Balto: Real‑time guidance, QA, and coaching for live calls; overlaps where teams want in‑moment training, compliance checks, and post‑call insights.
  • Tethr: Conversation analytics and automated QA from 100% of interactions; competes on detection and prioritization of quality issues and scorecard automation.
  • CallMiner: Enterprise conversation analytics and quality management (Eureka) across voice/text; overlaps on automated scoring, compliance, and coaching at scale.