Toothy AI logo

Toothy AI

AI for insurance verification & billing at dental clinics

Winter 2025active2025Website
Artificial IntelligenceHealth TechHealthcareDentalConversational AI
Sponsored
Documenso logo

Documenso

Open source e-signing

The open source DocuSign alternative. Beautiful, modern, and built for developers.

Learn more →
?

Your Company Here

Sponsor slot available

Want to be listed as a sponsor? Reach thousands of founders and developers.

Report from 4 days ago

What do they actually do

Toothy AI runs an AI‑plus‑human service that automates dental revenue‑cycle tasks: insurance eligibility/benefit verification, claims submission, EOB posting, and denial follow‑up. Its “real‑time AI verification” agent can place and handle payer calls, while U.S. billing experts step in for edge cases and appeals (Toothy site; PromptLoop overview%20with%20real%2Dtime%20data)).

Practices connect Toothy to their practice management system. When a patient books or checks in, Toothy verifies coverage and returns benefit details; it also files claims, tracks EOBs, and follows up on denials. The company markets the service as HIPAA‑compliant and focused on reducing front‑desk time, and it shows live demos/call samples with early customer traction noted in launch write‑ups (Toothy site; Fondo launch note).

Who are their target customer(s)

  • Small single‑location dental practices (owner or front‑desk manager): Staff spend hours on eligibility calls and chasing unpaid claims, pulling time from patients and scheduling. They need fast, reliable verification at check‑in and fewer claim follow‑ups (Toothy site).
  • In‑house billers at mid‑size clinics: They handle complex submissions and denials but are overloaded by routine carrier calls and inconsistent responses. They want automation that handles the repetitive work and only escalates true exceptions (PromptLoop%20with%20real%2Dtime%20data)).
  • Dental support organizations (DSOs) / multi‑location groups: They must standardize verification and billing across many clinics and PMSs while keeping costs predictable. They need a scalable system that reduces per‑clinic variance and integrates across tooling (YC jobs).
  • Third‑party or outsourced dental billers: High volumes of routine verifications and follow‑ups erode margins due to manual calling and tracking. They need automation for repetitive checks so human billers can focus on denials/appeals (Toothy site).
  • New or under‑resourced clinics (solo dentists, small chains): Limited staff means eligibility checks and denial follow‑up slip, causing cash‑flow delays. They want a low‑lift service that verifies coverage at booking/check‑in and reduces backlogs without new hires (Toothy site).

How would they acquire their first 10, 50, and 100 customers

  • First 10: Founder‑led local pilots: direct outreach to nearby single‑location practices, 2–4 week free pilots replacing manual verification, integration to the PMS, and simple case studies measuring time saved and recovered claims (Toothy site).
  • First 50: Build a repeatable outbound motion plus partnerships: targeted SDR outreach to small practices, referral deals with billing firms and dental societies, and use early case studies in sequences and paid search; add a referral credit to accelerate word‑of‑mouth (PromptLoop%20with%20real%2Dtime%20data)).
  • First 100: Move upmarket and scale GTM: hire an AE for multi‑clinic deals, prioritize top PMS integrations, pilot with DSOs to prove per‑clinic economics, and stand up onboarding/success with clear pricing/SLAs and selective conference/channel efforts (YC jobs).

What is the rough total addressable market

Top-down context:

The company is explicitly building to handle roughly 140,000 U.S. dental clinics, which broadly perform insurance verification and claims processing as part of routine operations (YC jobs).

Bottom-up calculation:

If average annual contract value is $6,000–$12,000 per clinic ($500–$1,000/month) for verification and RCM automation, applying that to ~140,000 clinics implies a TAM of about $0.8–$1.7B per year.

Assumptions:

  • Approx. 140k U.S. dental clinics is the relevant customer count (YC jobs).
  • Average pricing for verification/RCM automation falls in the $500–$1,000 per month range per clinic.
  • TAM reflects 100% clinic adoption; it does not discount for payer mix, clinic size, or partial feature adoption.

Who are some of their notable competitors

  • DentalXChange: A major clearinghouse/RCM platform with eligibility checks, claims, ERA/EOB posting, and an “Eligibility AI” product—competing via deep payer connections and integrated verification + claims workflows.
  • CareStack: All‑in‑one practice management and RCM software that includes verification and claims, reducing the need for a separate automation vendor for clinics and DSOs.
  • eAssist (Dental Solutions): Large outsourced dental billing/verification service staffed by human billers (with some automation), offering turnkey offloading of RCM tasks.
  • DentalRobot: AI‑first vendor advertising automated dental insurance verifications, benefit breakdowns, and PMS integrations; a direct competitor on automated verification and call handling.
  • Dental Intelligence (DentalIntel): Practice analytics and operations suite that bundles automated insurance eligibility and claims features within broader scheduling and performance tools.